Commenting and reporting on the NHL, specifically the Tampa Bay Lightning, along with entertainment.
Thursday, February 23, 2017
The Worst Movies of 2016
It would be nice to unveil my list of the top movies of 2016 before the Academy Awards Sunday, but there are still too many interesting films to watch before I can make the final decisions.
I'm hoping to find a way to see at least some of the following movies in the next month - Nocturnal Animals, Allied, Fences, Miss Sloane, Loving, Silence, 20th Century Women, Queen of Katwe, Elle, Doctor Strange, Moana, Hacksaw Ridge and The Edge of Seventeen.
So, we will start with another countdown. Other critics can do it. Why not me? My list of the best movies of 2016 will be posted in late March or early April, but now it's time for the very worst of the year among the 80-plus movies I have seen. And there were several good choices.
Barely worth a red box rent, but only if you are desperate - The Boss, The Finest Hours, Ghostbusters (Why?), Inferno, London Has Fallen 10 Cloverfield Lane, Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates, The Nice Guys, The Whole Truth (Keanu as a lawyer?), Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
Joe Lunardi's first five out of the top 10: The 5th Wave (Cute Chloe Moretz saves it from the worst 10), Zoolander 2, Hologram for a King (Hanks in a stinker), Batman vs. Superman (come on, man), A Bigger Splash (Dakota Johnson's brief nudity saves it from ninth or 10th worst).
Worst 10 of 2016
10. Into The Forest - Ellen Page and Evan Rachel Wood can't save this movie with an apocalyptic story line.
9. Approaching the Unknown - A mission to Mars that is quite boring.
8. Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising - The first one wasn't very good and this one wasn't much better, if any.
7. Marauders - Bruce Willis and Christopher Meloni (Stabler) wing it in this confusing, uninteresting crime drama,
6. Broken Vows - Jamie Alexander is quite attractive, but the Fatal Attraction-styled movie is cliched and unwatchable.
5. Run Lola Run - Bad film about bad people, but the somewhat surprising ending pushes it from worst of the year to fifth worst.
4. Midnight Special - Probably would be my pick for most disappointing of the year, because it's the only one of the 10 that I spent money on in the theater. There was a lot of nothing before an unsatisfying ending.
3. Hail Caesar!! - George Clooney can't rescue this totally dull film, which provided no laughs or interesting dialogue.
2. Point Break - Why? Sort of a remake of the classic film in a different local. After about 15 minutes, you are just waiting for it to end.
1. 13 Hours - Went in with an open mind wanting to learn a little bit more about what happened in Benghazi, but left not having an idea what was going on.
HOPES FOR OSCARS
Best actor - Casey Affleck, Manchester by the Sea (but Viggo Mortensen, Captain Fantastic was really good)
Best actress - Emma Stone, La La Land (Natalie Portman did a strong job in Jackie, too)
Best supporting actor - Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water (but Dev Patel, Lion would make me happy)
Best supporting actress - Octavia Spencer, Hidden Figures (but Nicole Kidman, Lion is close)
Monday, February 13, 2017
Nothing Should Change Yzerman's Plan
By Mark Pukalo
The Tampa Bay Lightning are
showing signs of life the last four games. They might not be dead yet.
There has been more energy,
much more support defensively and a spirit - that has been inconsistent at best
all season – resurfacing during the current 3-0-1 stretch. I don’t think the
Lightning are playing defensively. They are just playing better in their own
end and forechecking with more purpose to take pressure off their defense.
So, how should this latest
run of solid play change Steve Yzerman’s mindset with two weeks left before the
trade deadline?
Not one bit. Zero, zilch, nada, nil.
Three things can happen
before the end of the season for the Lightning and two are good while another
may be acceptable in a way. They could go on a historic run into the playoffs
and be a real contender to get to the final four. Yzerman can take advantage of
teams in or on the playoff bubble to clear salary cap space and get a jump on
smoothing out the rough edges of this team. Lastly, the postseason run can end at
three years and the team gets much-needed rest and re-evaluation time for
another go in 2017-18.
There are many reasons why
this season has not gone as expected. It’s many issues loaded into a big stew
that does not taste very good. Captain Steven Stamkos was playing the best
hockey of his life before going down with a knee injury. Ryan Callahan (hip)
has also been absent much of the season and, although many would like more
production from him, he is key as a leader, penalty killer and physical force. Throw in
the fact that the Lightning had the most players in the World Cup during the
preseason and they participated in the most playoff games the last two seasons.
Then, there’s some underachievement. But we’ll get to that later - on both the
players and the coach.
It has all led Yzerman to
the point where change has to be made. But it’s not a rebuild. It’s a makeover.
Doing nothing before the trade deadline would be silly and that doesn’t mean he
has to make rash moves. He’s been fishing around for months already and there’s
plenty of groundwork done. Now, it’s all about what other teams are going to do.
It’s about timing.
There are things Yzerman can
do now and other possibilities he should probably wait on until the morning of
the trade deadline March 1.
These are all good players
who have given their hearts to the organization and if there were no salary cap
you might not mind keeping them around until the end of their deals. But
salaries have to be moved to create space for next season and beyond.
Center Valtteri Filppula and
defenseman Jason Garrison could probably help a playoff team or one on the
edge. They can be dealt at any time - although Filppula owns a no-trade clause - and what the Lightning get back is not
important as long as they don’t bring back a player with big contract past this
season. They can even take back a little salary for next season if needed. The
Bolts can still compete without them. Brian Boyle can move over to center to
replace Filppula until Stamkos returns and Slater Koekkoek would step in for
Garrison.
The big move they could make
now is to deal Tyler Johnson. I know some fans out there won’t like it, but
Braydon Point’s play at center makes Johnson expendable, especially with his
contract up after this season. You could see St. Louis, Nashville, Los Angeles,
Anaheim or even Vancouver taking a run at T.J.
It would not be surprising
if center Vladislav Namestnikov or defenseman Andrej Sustr were moved either.
They are still young players and they show flashes, but neither has taken a
step forward this season and it has been one of the least talked about issues
with this team. Namestnikov needed to emerge as a consistent performer at
center when Stamkos went down and Sustr needed to raise his level of play with
Garrison’s performance declining. Neither accomplished the goal.
The Lightning will probably
have more evidence of whether they are legitimately in the playoff race on
trade deadline day and that’s when you might see a few late deals.
It has been reported that
teams have made some unsatisfactory offers for Ben Bishop already and Yzerman
must decide whether to take what he can get or hope a team sweetens the pot on
March 1. There are teams that could use Bishop down the stretch like Calgary,
even Carolina or Dallas if they are still in the race. If the best offer is a
fourth-round pick or worse, it’s probably not worth it. Teams might offer that
before July 1 for negotiating rights.
The other much tougher
question is what to do with Boyle if teams are offering tempting deals. In my
opinion, the Lightning need Boyle on the team next season. But if you can get
something good for him and sign him as a free agent on July 1 anyway, it could
be a nice daily double. Yzerman must gauge what it will take for Boyle to stay before then. It appears the big forward loves it here. Could you tell him we’ll resign you for $9 million, three years on July 1? The risk is some team with cap space like New Jersey or Carolina may throw five years $20 million in his
face? That’s a tough question to answer. To be honest, I’d just try to sign him now and
find a way to protect him in the expansion draft.
Yzerman always seems to get
more than expected in deals. But this time around, he probably has to lower his
expectations and prepare for next season. Jonathan Drouin must be re-signed -
soon. Ondrej Palat, too, although anything could happen if trading him might
bring back a solid top-four righty defenseman.
Now, back to
underachievement – one of the issues that has driven Lightning fans crazy all
season. I called their play stale at times through the first half of the
season, with virtually the same group as the previous two seasons. It seemed at
times it was more mental than physical. Things have always seemed to fall in
place for them the last two seasons. Nothing came easy this season and it
seemed they failed to have the proper energy to push through.
I may be the only one out
there that does not blame the goaltending at all. Bishop and Andrei Vasilevskiy
have not been great, but most nights they have given the team a chance to win.
Bishop’s mental game can’t be 100 percent knowing he’s likely somewhere else
next season and the team played so poorly in front of Vasilevskiy when he was
in net for nine in a row it was impossible to judge him. The Lightning are just
fine in net with the big Russian. Those talking - some on radio - about keeping
Bishop don’t understand. Even if they were to trade Vasy, they’d have to give
Bishop $6.5-7 million and there’s no way they meet the salary cap offering him that much. It makes no sense.
One local columnist even
mentioned that Victor Hedman, Nikita Kucherov and Drouin had underachieved in
some ways. With all due respect, that’s crazy.
Hedman is having his best
offensive season, was a serious Norris candidate until the team took a dive in
early January and has been the best player on the ice for more than half of
their games. Kucherov’s head seemed to be somewhere else for a few weeks in January, but he seems to be back in gear and headed toward a 30-goal
season. While no one will argue that Drouin is still a “work in progress” like
any 21-and-under player other than Connor “McJesus” McDavid, he has been one
the team’s best three players all season long - in every zone on the ice. He
will make a bad pass from time to time and have a quiet game once in a while,
but Drouin has worked hard on his defense and is far better than he was as a
rookie - and far better than anyone seems to want to give him credit for.
You can’t really blame the
decline on any one of their core players. Some have performed better than
others, but it has been more about consistency than anything else. While Palat
hasn’t had the season you hoped for, he was probably the best player on the ice
against Minnesota last week. It’s still my opinion that it all starts with the bottom
four on defense. It’s not good enough over the long run. They’ve played better
the last four games and Jake Dotchin has been a surprisingly nice addition. But that
shouldn’t change Yzerman’s mind about fixing the group for next season. Braydon
Coburn has been fine, but the other three spots are up for grabs.
It seems like I’m being too easy
on them. Maybe I am. But taking a few steps back and missing the playoffs this
season could be a positive in the end if Yzerman can create some cap space and
make a few heady deals.
It does not appear one of
his moves will be changing the coach. Jon Cooper can’t be blamed for the team’s
demise due to injuries and the other issues, but there are still reasons why
intelligent Lightning hockey fans who “know the game” can think maybe a different coach
could bring a fresh outlook the Lightning needs.
You can’t take away the
success from Cooper. He took the team within two wins of a Cup two seasons ago
and within a pair of goals of the finals in 2015-16. But you can also say this:
He had very, very good players. Lots of them.
I’m reserving opinion on
whether Cooper should be fired after the season if the Lightning fade out of
the race down the stretch. We’ll see. But there are many reasons to make the
call to sack him.
*His forward lines don’t
make sense sometimes and he has always seemed to play favorites, allowing
certain players to make mistake after mistake while others are damaged by one.
How can Erik Condra ever play on a scoring line?
*Cooper tends to throw out
the second-best unit to start the power play too often. There are times when
players on the better unit have just been out for a long shift. Understood.
But, in my opinion, Kucherov and Drouin should be out first every time unless
there is a major reason why they can’t be. There’s been too many times the
other unit went out and had little pressure, but due to circumstances used up
90 seconds of the power play without Kooch or Drouin getting a significant
chance.
*It was strange sometimes
that Nikita Nesterov was scratched for a game or two because of poor play and
the first game back he got the third or fourth most ice time. You can blame
Rick Bowness for throwing Nesty out too much, but it’s Cooper’s job to manage
that in the game plan.
*Cooper burned out Vasilevskiy
during the rough stretch when Bishop was out. Kristers Gudlevskis should have
played in the “scheduled loss” at Washington and Vasy could have sat in another
third period or two when his defense was imploding.
*There are a few reasons to
use seven defensemen in the lineup occasionally - especially in a back-to-back
situation. But Cooper does it too much. It leads to constant line switching and
no flow. Several times, a forward has gone down when he has started seven D for
no reason and they’ve had to go with 10 up front.
*His constant line adjusting
has often been due to injuries, but sometimes needless changes have come after one or
two losses. Last season, it seemed that the Drouin-Stamkos-Callahan line was
off to a nice start and were growing together. One or two so-so games from the trio and they were broken up – never to skate together again.
*Koekkoek was solid when he
first came up from Syracuse this season and his play dipped slightly after
about 10 games. Instead of realizing young defensemen are going to have a few
rough games from time to time and letting him play through it, the former
first-round pick was benched. With him sitting for a few games, Yzerman felt
the need to send Koekkoek down so he could play. There were way too many nights
Lightning fans had to watch Nesterov make gaff after gaff with Koekkoek
enjoying popcorn or skating in a Crunch sweater.
*There are times when he
seems to make quick, inaccurate decisions on who is at fault on the ice. This
might have cost the Lightning a game against the Bruins recently. Cooper and
every Lightning fan were livid over the goal given up at the end of the second
period that gave the hated Bears a lead. He seemed to blame the
Boyle-Filppula-Drouin line that was on the ice and severely limited their ice
time in the third period. But when you look at the play, most of the fault lied
with Sustr and Garrison. Drouin was down the ice and came back to help, but
David Krejci had carried the puck 1-on-4 into the zone way too easily. The two
defensemen had every chance to make a play and didn’t. Sure, you can’t bench
two defensemen and play with four the whole third period. But you needed Boyle
and Drouin on the ice and they were not a factor in the third.
Cooper has won plenty of
games and he’s been a good coach when you look at his entire resume. But it is
not out of the question to think about a change. Lightning fans have
reasons to come to that conclusion.
The message to Bolts fans
after the “bye week” is this. Enjoy the final two months. It could bring you
something special. It could bring a fresh change or an exciting new player.
Taking one year off from the
playoffs may give you a half dozen postseasons in a row and the Cup in the near
future. The frame of this team is solid. It just needs a touch up and some
luck.
But Yzerman cannot sit on
his hands the next weeks, no matter whether his team continues to munch points
or not. He needs to think about the future.
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Top 150 Movies in 50 Years - 150-141
150.
When Harry Met Sally – The first time I saw Bethel High
graduate and one-time UConn student Meg Ryan was on the soap opera “As the
World Turns,” and you could tell she was going to be a star. Ryan burst on the
scene with her performance in this 1989 romantic comedy written by Nora Ephron
and directed by Rob Reiner. She was in charge with Billy Crystal in every
scene, including the famous one in the diner (look it up on youtube).
149.
Searching for Sugar Man – A
fascinating documentary about Sixto Rodriguez, a sort of Latin Bob Dylan from
the streets of Detroit who did not make it in America but became a superstar in
Apartheid-infested South Africa without knowing it. Two fans from Cape Town
attempt to unlock the mystery of Rodriguez and tell an incredible story that is
sad and ultimately uplifting. It won the Oscar for Best Documentary of 2012.
148.
Any Given Sunday – Oliver Stone’s loud, bold look at the glory
and the vices of professional football works despite some over-the-top scenes.
Al Pacino plays an aging coach under fire with a beat-up veteran quarterback
(Dennis Quaid) and a new-wave signal caller (Jamie Foxx) with talent finding
his way on and off the field. There are some powerful moments, led by Pacino’s
speech to the team before the big game.
147.
The American President – Aaron Sorkin wrote the romantic comedy
and Rob Reiner directed as a widowed president (Michael Douglas) - up for
re-election - courts a beautiful lobbyist (Annette Bening). Bening plays Sydney
Ellen Wade with grace and power while the film mixes plenty of humor with a
little of politics. You wonder what would happen if we had a single president.
146.
Gladiator – The film won Best Picture and Russell Crowe took
Best Actor at the Academy Awards in 2000 for his role as Maximus, a man who
rises up to avenge the murder of his loved ones during the Roman Empire. The
movie has its detractors (Roger Ebert) and is far from perfect, but it boasts
many powerful scenes. “Are you not entertained?”
145.
Spaceballs –
Mel Brooks’ goofy, but creative and smart, parody of the Star Wars movies from
1987 is a laugh a minute. Dark Helmet’s ship moves at “Ludicrous Speed.” May
the Schwartz be with you! Dick Van Patten and Joan Rivers join an all-star
crew.
144.
Brian’s Song – Make sure you have some tissues available for
this TV movie about the unique friendship between Chicago Bears running backs
Gale Sayers (Billy Dee Williams) and cancer-stricken Brian Piccolo (James
Caan). The 1971 film won an Emmy for Best Dramatic Program and was one of the
first I ever watched. Billy Dee’s speech at the end is one of the most
emotional scenes I can remember.
143.
American Beauty – This odd, exhilarating and sometimes
depressing film about dysfunctional families won Best Picture at the 1999
Academy Awards. Kevin Spacey plays the frustrated Lester Burnham, who finds
happiness by rejecting his average life and burned-out wife (Annette Bening)
while crushing on his daughter’s friend (Mena Suvari). It is crude, at times
cringe-worthy, but ultimately entertaining.
142.
Field of Dreams – The mystical 1989 film might be higher on
many lists of the top sports movies of all time, but it is still a classic in
my mind. “If you build it, he will come.” Kevin Costner creates a pristine
baseball field near a cornfield in Iowa after hearing voices and a miracle
occurs. You want to have a catch?
141.
Charlie Wilson’s War – Tom Hanks plays Texas Congressman Charlie
Wilson, who takes a break from jumping into Jacuzzis with playboy models to
help the Afgans kick Russia out of their country. An All-Star cast with Julia
Roberts, Amy Adams and the great Phillip Seymour Hoffman make it a fun,
informative journey. One of the last scenes tells the tale of one major reason
America faces hate around the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)